In the last several days, as I have reflected some on what I shared with you last week concerning Barnabas - and as I have continued on in my study from the book of Acts - I feel compelled to share a bit more about Barnabas, as the Holy Spirit has brought it to my attention.
As a review, we noted together in our first study of Barnabas that he was “a good man, and full of the Holy Ghost and of faith.” (Acts 10:24a)
And we noted that there were three essential points of action that Barnabas took relative to the faith:
1. He surrendered all to Christ
2. He defended the Gospel
3. He exhorted
These are some of the very important additional distinctions and points to be made. The Bible tells us in Acts 4:36-37 that “..Joses, who by the apostles was surnamed Barnabas (which is, being interpreted, The son of consolation), a Levite, and of the country of Cyprus, Having land, sold it, and brought the money, and laid it at the apostles’ feet.”
I don’t intend to repeat portions of Part I just for repeating them, but I shared those just to review for these additional observations.
1. Barnabas’ heart was correct
This attitude stands in stark contrast to Ananias and Sapphira - a Christian couple referenced in Chapter 5 of Acts:
1But a certain man named Ananias, with Sapphira his wife, sold a possession, 2And kept back part of the price, his wife also being privy to it, and brought a certain part, and laid it at the apostles' feet. 3But Peter said, Ananias, why hath Satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost, and to keep back part of the price of the land?
4Whiles it remained, was it not thine own? and after it was sold, was it not in thine own power? why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart? thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God. 5And Ananias hearing these words fell down, and gave up the ghost: and great fear came on all them that heard these things. 6And the young men arose, wound him up, and carried him out, and buried him. 7And it was about the space of three hours after, when his wife, not knowing what was done, came in. 8And Peter answered unto her, Tell me whether ye sold the land for so much? And she said, Yea, for so much. 9Then Peter said unto her, How is it that ye have agreed together to tempt the Spirit of the Lord? behold, the feet of them which have buried thy husband are at the door, and shall carry thee out. 10Then fell she down straightway at his feet, and yielded up the ghost: and the young men came in, and found her dead, and, carrying her forth, buried her by her husband. 11And great fear came upon all the church, and upon as many as heard these things. 12And by the hands of the apostles were many signs and wonders wrought among the people; (and they were all with one accord in Solomon's porch. 13And of the rest durst no man join himself to them: but the people magnified them. 14And believers were the more added to the Lord, multitudes both of men and women.)
The story of Ananias and Sapphira is a very sobering one. It tells of people - people who had believed on Christ and received him into their hearts, mind you - who conceived sin in their heart. They lied to God, according to the scriptures. We are told by the scripture that they would well have been “within their rights” to keep back a portion of the proceeds, as the land rightly belonged to them (as much as anything belongs to anyone, when we realize that when push comes to shove, all that we have and all that we are belongs to God).
The moral of the story is that God will not be mocked. And he was sending a powerful and assertive message to the early church that hearts to deceive would not be tolerated. These days, we rarely see a person or couple straightway struck dead if they fail to give to the local church or in some other way “hold out” on God (so far as I know). But don’t be fooled; just because God doesn’t appear to resort to this degree of “earthly punishment” doesn’t mean that there isn’t a heavy price to be paid in spiritual separation and the natural consequences of sin in this life and the life to come.
Barnabas’ heart was correct; this is a distinction that the writer and the Holy Spirit wants for us to see - and an example to follow.
2. Barnabas embraced his spiritual giftings and executed them with happiness unto God
Have you ever given any thought to what your spiritual giftings are? The Bible says we all have them. According to I Corinthians 12:1 “Now concerning spiritual gifts, brethren, I would not have you ignorant.” The Greek simply reads "spirituals" (ton pneumatikon), meaning "things characterized or controlled by the Spirit." V. 8 goes on to say “For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit; v. 9 To another faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same spirit; v. 10 To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits, ; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another interpretation of tongues: v. 11 But all these worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit, dividing to every man severally as he will.”
We ALL have spiritual gifts - and that is for another blog entry - but if you haven’t really considered what yours is - or you don’t know what it is - consider taking this spiritual gifts survey: http://www.bellevue.org/uploads/giftsintro.htm
Well, all of that to say this: Paul knew his place in the ministry. Someone from the outside looking in might say “Gosh, a guy with Barnabas’ tenure, seniority and caliber should not be being obscured by, overshadowed by or “folding in to” Paul of Tarsus.” After all, as we spoke about in the first study, look at Paul’s record. He was a murderer and a persecutor of the apostles and early Christians. It might have been easy for Barnabas to say “Wait a second here, I’m in command. This is MY ministry. I don’t know where you get off trying to act like you own this show.”
But the fact is that Barnabas gently and kindly accepted his role in God’s ministry, wherever the Holy Spirit revealed to him it was. Sometimes we can really get caught up in ego - and I daresay that it happens just as much in ministry as anywhere else (unfortunately). Barnabas didn’t allow this to happen; as Paul’s reach, anointing and power by the Holy Spirit grew, Barnabas remained agile, moldable and submissive to the Holy Spirit.
3. Barnabas had a forgiving spirit
We saw this first in Barnabas in his approach to Paul. You couldn’t have found a great many more people around that area where Paul’s name - when mentioned - wouldn’t have been quickly followed by a cry to stone him or run in the opposite direction. But Barnabas came beside him and mentored him with Christ-like care and compassion.
Barnabas and Paul traveled to a great many cities together preaching and leading people to Christ. When they returned to Antioch, they prepared for their second missionary journey. Barnabas proposed that they take Mark (John Mark) on this second journey, but Paul strongly objected on the basis that Mark had left them on their first trip.
The scripture tells of the affair in this passage from Acts 15:
36 Some time later Paul said to Barnabas, “Let us go back and visit the believers in all the towns where we preached the word of the Lord and see how they are doing.” 37 Barnabas wanted to take John, also called Mark, with them, 38 but Paul did not think it wise to take him, because he had deserted them in Pamphylia and had not continued with them in the work. 39 They had such a sharp disagreement that they parted company. Barnabas took Mark and sailed for Cyprus, 40 but Paul chose Silas and left, commended by the believers to the grace of the Lord. 41 He went through Syria and Cilicia, strengthening the churches.”
There you have it: “they had such a sharp disagreement that they parted company.” I have a feeling that this was a real, knock-down, drag-out fight. Not a fistfight, mind you.. but it just doesn’t get much more descriptive than that. This argument led to broken fellowship between these two. And frankly, I have always thought that Barnabas was right and Paul was wrong. Paul demonstrated through his ministry a very no-nonsense approach: a certain rigidness. We don’t know all of the details about why Mark left them on their first trip, and whether his cause may or may not have been justified. But if anybody should have been willing to forgive, it should have been Paul.
BUT - God worked it out. The Bible tells us in Romans 8:28 (one of my favorite verses in all of scripture), that “and we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose.”
Am I suggesting God planted this rift? Not necessarily. But I am saying that rather than having this one team of Barnabas and Paul, the situation ended up creating a team of Paul and Timothy on one trip and Barnabas and Mark on another. PLUS - through those trips, I believe Paul was able to disciple Timothy and Barnabas was able to disciple John Mark in ways that would have been possible had the original plan gone through. I believe it turned out just the way God wanted it.
And the scripture tells us that - later on - Paul and Barnabas came together again in fellowship. And if I was a betting man, I would submit that Barnabas probably sent Paul an email and asked him to lunch, saying “hey, let’s get this silly dispute ended.” Our friendship means more than that. That’s just the type of man he was.
I sincerely hope that these two studies have given you a glimpse of this good man. I know that reading about him has edified me, and helped me to want to be more of an encourager, as Barnabas was.
God Bless You tonight.. Get ready - next blog is going to be on this topic: “Do I really know God?” I promise you, it’s going to be a humdinger.
No comments:
Post a Comment